Sanger v. Flow
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Error to the United States Court in the Indian Territory. Action by Sanger Bros, against Flow & Foster, in which L. P. Ander* Bon intervened. There was judgment on verdicts for defendants and intervener, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
On the 24th of November, 1890, the plaintiffs in error brought suit in the court below against Flow & Foster upon account for $2,171.67. On the same day the plaintiffs filed an affidavit for an attachment against the defendants, upon the ground that they had disposed of their property with the intent to defraud their creditors. An order of attachment was issued on the 24th of November, and on the same day levied on a stock of general merchandise, store fixtures, safe and contents, books, accounts, and notes, which had been the property of the defendants. Upon the application of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Smiths v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Emerson v. SenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Holliday Bros. v. CohenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Root v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Blaylock v. Incorporated Town of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.