Legal Opinion

Holliday Bros. v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from Chicot Circuit Court, Hon. T. E. Sorrells, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEakin, J.

Appellants sued Colien upon a bill of exchange, drawn by him, in their favor, upon Richardson & May, of New Orleans, for $1,000, dated at Laconia, Arkansas, January 1, 1876, payable twenty days thereafter. Acceptance was refused, and the same was presented again for payment at maturity; which was refused, also — the said drawees answering, as the complaint says, “that they had no funds of defendant with which to pay the-same.” There is no more direct allegation that there were no funds; nor any allegation of notice to defendants. "With the complaint, they filed an affidavit for an attachment,…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Estate of AkersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Sanger v. FlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1891
  5. Anderson v. SloaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API