City of Clinton Ex Rel. Richardson v. Keen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The petitioner seeks relief in mandamus on the theory that the respondent, the regular district judge of Custer county, has misconstrued the mandate and failed to properly comply therewith in a cause appealed from his court and. here reversed. No. 30709, City of Clinton v. George W. Cornell et al., 191 Okla. 600, 132 P. 2d 340. It is respondent’s position that he properly construed the mandate and that his action taken thereon was legitimate and proper.
Essential facts are that in cause No. 6658, pending in said district court, issues of law and fact were joined, and trial was had to an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Benton v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Rogers v. Biggstaff'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Hoffman v. ShueyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Silvern v. SilvernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Bell v. Great Lakes Container Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Power v. SullivanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.