Commonwealth v. Gill, R., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baer
In this appeal, we examine whether the Superior Court properly applied the "abuse of discretion" standard of review when, in a published opinion, it reversed a trial court order that granted a criminal defendant's motion in limine to admit evidence of a subsequent similar crime committed by another individual. For the reasons that follow, we respectfully conclude that the Superior Court misapplied this standard of review. Consequently, we reverse in part and vacate in part the Superior Court's judgment and remand to the Superior Court with instructions.
The background underlying this appeal is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ClaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Com. v. James, JSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- C. Hahn v. Lawrence CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Battaglia, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Bowser, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Boyer, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.