Peeler v. . Peeler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaricsoN, J.
The principal question involved on this appeal is whether P. A. D. Peeler is released by paying into court the sum of $300. "We think not.
The intent of the parties is arrived at by taking into consideration all the paper-writings relating to the controversy, the condition of the parties and the purpose for which they were entered into. The setting surrounding the parties when the paper-writings were signed, the family relationship, the purpose of the entire paper-writings on the subject, must all be considered in arriving at the intent. In re Westfeldt, 188 N. C., 711; Brown v. Brown, 195 N.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- West v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Rhyne Ex Rel. Rhyne v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Ellington v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pure Oil Co. v. BaarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Floor v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. SmithdealDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1951