Legal Opinion

Peeler v. . Peeler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaricsoN, J.

The principal question involved on this appeal is whether P. A. D. Peeler is released by paying into court the sum of $300. "We think not.

The intent of the parties is arrived at by taking into consideration all the paper-writings relating to the controversy, the condition of the parties and the purpose for which they were entered into. The setting surrounding the parties when the paper-writings were signed, the family relationship, the purpose of the entire paper-writings on the subject, must all be considered in arriving at the intent. In re Westfeldt, 188 N. C., 711; Brown v. Brown, 195 N.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. West v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Rhyne Ex Rel. Rhyne v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Ellington v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. BaarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Floor v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. SmithdealDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API