Legal Opinion

State v. Wickham

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1990No. S-3233PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1355OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

Phillip J. Wickham was tried for manslaughter and third-degree assault. In an in limine ruling, the trial court decided that if Wickham testified the state could impeach him with evidence of prior convictions. Wickham chose not to testify and was convicted. On appeal, the court of appeals held that the ruling was reviewable even though Wickham did not testify, but reserved making a final disposition pending remand for further proceedings in the trial court.

We granted the state's petition for hearing to decide whether criminal defendants must testify to preserve…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. LaVigne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State of Iowa v. Justin Robert DerbySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Barcai v. BetweeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  5. State v. SemancikAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API