Legal Opinion

LaVigne v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1991No. S-3873PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

Petitioner Ronald J. LaVigne’s lawyer denied him the opportunity to testify in his own behalf at his criminal trial. After being convicted by a jury, LaVigne moved for a new trial on the grounds that his rights under the United States and Alaska Constitutions were violated. The superior court denied LaVigne’s motion after LaVigne refused to offer proof of what his testimony would have been, thus establishing that he was prejudiced by the violation of his rights. The court of appeals upheld the decision. LaVigne v. State, 788 P.2d 52 (Alaska App.1990). It agreed that any…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SalmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. RimmerTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API