Legal Opinion
Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk Gmbh & Co. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 1, 1989No. 89-1298PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
In this customs duty case, the United States Court of International Trade granted summary judgment in favor of the United States, holding that, as a matter of law, Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GmbH & Co.’s (Goldhofer) protest of liquidation was not timely filed with the United States Customs Service (Customs) within the 90-day protest period set forth by 19 U.S.C. § 1514(c)(2) (1982). Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GmbH & Co. v. United States, 706 F.Supp. 892 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1989). In reaching that disposition, the Court of International Trade concluded that posting “bulletin notice”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Reliable Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Juice Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Transcom, Inc., and L & S Bearing Company v. Unite States, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.