Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Jackson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 14, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The question presented for decision is the moaning of paragraph 20 (e) of the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911 (Pamph. L., p. 134), incorporated therein by chapter 93 of the laws of 1919 (Pamph. L., pp. 201, 209), in terms following:
“Whenever it shall appear that an employer is being prejudiced by virtue of the refusal of an injured employe to accept proffered medical and surgical treatment deemed necessary by the physician selected by the employer, or his failure or neglect to comply with the instructions of the physician in charge of the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Budden v. GoldsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Olive Hill v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Fordson Coal Co. v. PalkoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.