Legal Opinion

Knight v. . Little

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

While the plaintiffs make no formal motion to dismiss the appeal for that it is fragmentary and premature, they so contend in their brief filed and cite authorities in support thereof. It has been so held by this Court, Holt v. Warehouse Co., 116 N. C., 487; Smith v. Wooding, 177 N. C., 546, 94 S. E., 404; Monroe v. Holder, 182 N. C., 79, 108 S. E., 359; Johnson v. Mills Co., 196 N. C., 93, 144 S. E., 534, and cases cited.

Even though an appeal be premature this Court may, in its discretion, consider the questions presented and express an opinion upon the merits thereof. Dowdy v. Dowdy, 154 N.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Merritt Milling Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Dowdy v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Washington v. Safe Bus, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API