Legal Opinion

Gould v. Frost

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby' County. —Frawcis Fbutbess, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

(Mr Justice LaNsdeN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This, bill was filed to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the property of a married woman. About March 14, 1914, the residence of Mrs. I. N. Frost *468was destroyed by fire. It was insured, and she collected the insurance money on the burned residence. Pier then husband, Dr. I. N. Frost, made a contract with the complainant to rebuild the burned house. In making the contract Frost was acting as the agent of his wife. She was at the house a number of times while it was being rebuilt, and gave directions for its rebuilding. There is an unpaid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knoxville Ry. & Light Co. v. VangilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Chattanooga v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Parlow v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gill v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McIrvin v. Lincoln Memorial UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bell Bros. Co., Inc. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  4. Phillip Carey Co. v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Mayo v. Bank of GleasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API