Legal Opinion

Gill v. McKinney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 23 opinions

FROM SHELBY Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. ■ — -HoN. F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaNsdeN

The bill in this case was filed to remove a deed of Mrs. McKinney to defendant Knight as a cloud upon complainant’s title. Mrs. McKinney was the owner of the land in controversy. On June 29, 1914, she signed and executed a deed conveying the land to E. N. Gill and his wife, the complainant. This deed was duly recorded. Later Mr. and Mrs. Gill separated. She went to Little Bock, Ark., and her husband remained in Memphis, Tenn., on the land. The negotiations for the sale and purchase of the land by Gill and wife from Mrs. McKinney were conducted by one T. F. Turley as agent for both parties.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knoxville Ry. & Light Co. v. VangilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lillienkamp v. RippetoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bennett v. HutchensTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kyle v. ConnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1802
  5. Baker v. DewTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Trousdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jordan v. JohnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hicks v. SprankleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Johnson v. FordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Morton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API