City of Chattanooga v. Carter
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.— Nathan L. Bachman, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher
A recovery was bad by C. PI. Carter, the husband, for the loss of services of his wife by reason of personal injuries sustained by her. The judgment of the circuit court was sustained by the court of civil ap*610peals. It is assigned as error that no recovery can be had by the hnsband in snch cases since the Married Women’s Act of 1913, chapter 26, which provides as follows:
“That married women be, and are, hereby fully emancipated from all disability on account of cover-ture, and the common law as to the disabilities of married women and its effect on the rights of property of the wife, is…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Rush v. Great American Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Gill v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- All v. John Gerber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Binegar v. DaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Dunn v. Alabama Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.