Legal Opinion

Grim v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1991No. S014192Published

1Opinion of the Court

53 Cal.3d 21 (1991)

805 P.2d 941

278 Cal. Rptr. 682

DOUGLAS PAUL GRIM, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Docket No. S014192.

Supreme Court of California.

March 14, 1991.

COUNSEL

Douglas Paul Grim, in pro. per., Margolis & Margolis, and Arthur L. Margolis for Petitioner.

Diane C. Yu, Richard J. Zanassi, Sandra T. Larson and Gael T. InfandeWeiss for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (review department) that petitioner Douglas Paul Grim be disbarred from the practice of law for having wilfully misappropriated over…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API