Legal Opinion

Hershley v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1983No. WD 33776PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

Shelley and Roy Hershley filed an action against Dr. Merlin Brown and Richard Wolfe Medical Instruments. The trial court sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss the claim on grounds that Missouri does not recognize actions for wrongful conception, and that the action was barred by limitations. The Hershleys appealed, claiming that because this case involved a foreign object, it was not time barred, that the statute of limitations was tolled because of Dr. Brown’s fraudulent concealment, and that Missouri recognizes wrongful conception 1 claims. Affirmed in part and reversed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Swope v. PrintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Hinkle v. HargensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rainer v. Community Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Budding v. SSM Healthcare SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Wilkerson v. Mid-America CardiologyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Smith v. Paslode Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API