Legal Opinion

State v. Lorenzo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2014No. CC C100238CR; CA A145826; SC S060969PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*136BALMER, C. J.

This is the third of three cases that we decide today in which we consider when evidence obtained during a voluntary consent search must nonetheless be suppressed on the theory that the consent was the product of a prior police illegality. This court previously addressed that question in State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), and today we modified part of the Hall exploitation analysis in State v. Unger, 356 Or 59, 333 P3d 1009 (2014). We disavowed the requirement in Hall that a defendant make a threshold showing of a minimal factual nexus between the police illegality and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. MusserOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MusserOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. BenningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. PichardoOregon Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API