State v. Pichardo
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.
KISTLER, J.
An officer stopped defendant to investigate whether he was helping another person evade the police. During the stop, the officer asked defendant for consent to a search for drugs. The primary question in this case is whether the officer’s request for consent was reasonably related to the reason for the stop and thus did not extend it in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RondeauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. SarmentoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.