State v. Musser
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*150BALMER, C. J.
This is one of three cases that we decide today in which we examine when evidence obtained pursuant to a voluntary consent search must be suppressed on the theory that the consent was the result of exploitation of prior illegal police conduct. In the first of the three cases, State v. Unger, 356 Or 59, 333 P3d 1009 (2014), we modified part of the exploitation analysis announced in State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005). We disavowed the requirement in Hall that a defendant must establish a “minimal factual nexus” between the unlawful police conduct and the disputed evidence,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LorenzoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LorenzoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SuppahOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.