Legal Opinion

N. K. Fairbank & Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 26, 1892No. 50PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Assumpsit by N. K. Fairbank & Co., a corporation, against the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company. The case was dismissed on defendant’s motion., Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRESHAM, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by N. K. Fairbank <& Co., a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, in the district of its residence, against the Cincinnati, New Orleans <& Texas Pacific Railway Company, an Ohio corporation, owning and operating a line of railway extending from Cincinnati, in the last-named state, to Chattanooga, in the state of Tennessee, to recover the value of á car load or more of cotton oil which was lost hy tho defendant, while in its possession as a common carrier. The first summons was returned, not served, by order of the plaintiff, and an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Ry. v. DeBowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Doe v. Springfield Boiler & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  4. Mills v. WagnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wall v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API