Legal Opinion

United States v. William Dee Robert Lentz Carl Gepp

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1990No. 89-5606PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

William Dee, Robert Lentz, and Carl Gepp (hereafter collectively “defendants”) appeal the judgment of the district court entered after a jury trial finding them guilty of multiple violations of the criminal provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq 1 We affirm.

I

RCRA provides a comprehensive scheme for regulating storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, requiring that it be managed to prevent leakage, spillage, hazardous chemical reactions, and migration of toxins into the soil, water, or air. In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., United States of America v. Baytank (Houston), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Steven M. SelfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. James Ralph SellersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. William B. Ellen, United States of America v. William B. EllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API