Legal Opinion
Sogomonian v. C. F. Hovey Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRttgg, C.J.
This is a petition to establish the truth of exceptions which were disallowed “as not being conformable to the truth.” The petition has been referred to a commissioner and the case comes before us on his report.
It is contended that this petition cannot be maintained because the bill of exceptions was not seasonably acted upon by the judge. The facts upon which that contention is predicated are these: The time for allowance of the exceptions would expire in accordance with notice under Rule 53. of Superior Court (1923) on February 24, 1925. Before the *553time had expired, the exceptions had been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Danforth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Sanford v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Patterson v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.