Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Ciborowski
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1931PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The finding of the trial judge in this action of contract in a district court was for the plaintiff. Thereafter the defendants, desiring to take the case to the Appellate Division, filed a draft report. That, draft report was disallowed by the trial judge in these words: “This report is disallowed because of the second sentence of the second paragraph on Page Two.” That sentence was that “He [the plaintiff] further testified on cross-examination that the oil burner was to be a Super Oil Heater to be installed according to law and Fire Prevention Regulations and .so as to. give the defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonough v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Holton v. American Pastry Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Commonwealth v. VallarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Vengrow v. GrimesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Forbes v. Gordon & Gerber, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Barry v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Haines Corp. v. Winthrop Square Cafe, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.