Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Kingan & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 30, 1934No. 13930PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. C. T. Graydon, Acting Associate Justice.
This action was commenced on the 17th day of May, 1933, by the service of a summons and complaint upon one E. M. Hirsch, a resident of Kingstree, County of Williams-burg, in the State of South Carolina, upon the theory that E. M. Hirsch was an agent of the defendant, Kingan & Co.
The complaint alleged in part that the defendant, Kingan & Co., was engaged in the business of selling food for human consumption, and that among its products was one known as “Frankfurt Style Sausage” packaged in ten-pound cartons…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pollock v. B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
- Jenkins v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- McSwain v. Adams Grain & Provision Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Abbeville Electric Light & Power Co. v. Western Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Dyar v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Jones v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Belue v. FetnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Matthews v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Industrial Equipment Co. v. Frank G. Hough Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.