Legal Opinion
ADETIBA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1992No. ID 3177PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3177 MATTER OF ADETIBA In Deportation Proceedings A-29571508 Decided by Board May 22, 1992 (1) The Board of Immigration Appeals follows its historical approach as to what constitutes a "single scheme of criminal misconduct" within the meaning of section 241(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(A)(ii) (Supp. II 1990), by interpreting the statutory language to mean that when an alien has performed an act, which, in and of itself, constitutes a complete, individual, and distinct crime, be is deportable when he again commits such an act,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
- CERNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Perceira Goncalves v. INSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- Mlaith Abdelqadar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- PONCE DE LEONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.