Legal Opinion

David Tunick, Inc. v. Kornfeld

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 2, 1993No. 91 Civ. 7027 (DNE)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This action arises from Mr. E.W. Kornfeld’s and Galerie Kornfeld und Cie’s (the “defendants”) sale of a signed Picasso print to plaintiff, David Tunick, Inc. (“Tunick” or “plaintiff”). Plaintiff alleges that defendants sold Tunick a print of Le Minotourmachie which defendants represented was signed by Pablo Picasso but which, in fact, bears a forged signature. As a result, plaintiff has brought this action alleging fraud, misrepresentation, breach of the duties of honesty and good faith in fair dealing, and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants have…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Anglo American Insurance Group, P.L.C. v. CalFed Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Doe v. Delaware State PoliceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API