Legal Opinion

People v. Schmitt

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1895No. 21173PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

Appellant was charged with the murder of Mrs. Charlotte Gardemeyer, alleged to have been committed November 17, 1893, and was found guilty by the jury of murder in the first degree, with the penalty of imprisonment for life.

The fact that defendant committed the homicide was not controverted, the defense being that he was insane; and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

*50The motion for a new trial is based upon alleged errors in the admission and exclusion of evidence, and upon instructions given and refused, and upon a statement of law made to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Marshall v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In Re DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API