Legal Opinion

Idaho Potato Commission v. Russet Valley Produce, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1995No. 20872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

I

NATURE OF THE CASE

This case began as an administrative proceeding before the Idaho Potato Commission (Commission) to revoke the license of Russet Valley Produce, Inc. to use the “Grown in Idaho” trademark on potatoes. The Commission previously entered an administrative order that only “Russet Burbank” potatoes could be packaged with a “Grown in Idaho” label, and that all other potatoes had to have the variety indicated on the package. (Research had shown that most consumers believed they were purchasing Russet Bur-banks when buying “Idaho” potatoes.) Russet Valley made two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foster v. City of St. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kopp v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dovel v. DobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. O'Loughlin v. Circle a ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Van Orden v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Agency of Natural Resources v. DesoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Ralph Naylor Farms, LLC v. Latah CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gardiner v. Boundary County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Bonner County v. CunninghamIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API