Ralph Naylor Farms, LLC v. Latah County
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice Pro Tem.
This is an appeal from a decision of the district court denying Ralph Naylor Farms’ (Naylor Farms) motion for an award of attorney fees and costs pursuant to Idaho Code section 12-117 and Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). Because the County did not act without a reasonable basis in fact or law in adopting an ordinance creating an overlay zone, we affirm the district court’s denial of attorney fees and costs.
*808I.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Naylor Farms filed an application with the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) on June 26, 2002, requesting a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Fischer v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Cox v. DEPARTMENT OF INS., STATEIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Envirosafe Services of Idaho, Inc. v. County of OwyheeIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Highlands Development Corp. v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Flying "A" Ranch v. County Commissioners of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Wohrle v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.