Legal Opinion

Ralph Naylor Farms, LLC v. Latah County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2007No. 33422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice Pro Tem.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court denying Ralph Naylor Farms’ (Naylor Farms) motion for an award of attorney fees and costs pursuant to Idaho Code section 12-117 and Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). Because the County did not act without a reasonable basis in fact or law in adopting an ordinance creating an overlay zone, we affirm the district court’s denial of attorney fees and costs.

*808I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Naylor Farms filed an application with the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) on June 26, 2002, requesting a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fischer v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cox v. DEPARTMENT OF INS., STATEIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Envirosafe Services of Idaho, Inc. v. County of OwyheeIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Highlands Development Corp. v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Flying "A" Ranch v. County Commissioners of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Wohrle v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API