Legal Opinion
Gardiner v. Boundary County Board of Commissioners
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 2010No. 35007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
W. JONES, Justice.
Tungsten Holding, Inc. (Tungsten) owns a parcel of land in Boundary County, Idaho that is zoned agriculture/forestry under Boundary County, Idaho, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance 99-06 (the Zoning Ordinance). In order to operate a commercial gravel pit on its premises, on March 22, 2005, Tungsten filed an application to obtain a special use permit. The Boundary County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the application on May 19, 2005, and made a recommendation to deny the special use permit. The Boundary County Board of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Friends of Farm to Market v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Evans v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Burns Holdings, LLC v. Teton County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Diamond House of SE Idaho, LLC v. City of AmmonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Hymas v. Meridian Police DepartmentIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015