Legal Opinion
Palagin v. Paniagua Construction, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2013No. A137754PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Igor Palagin (Palagin) appeals from a judgment, entered against him after a trial de novo in the superior court, concerning a wage claim he initially brought before the Labor Commissioner. (Lab. Code, § 98 et seq.) Palagin contends (1) the court should have dismissed the proceedings, because respondents did not post an undertaking by the statutory deadline (§ 98.2(b)); (2) the court erred in allowing respondents to withdraw the undertaking after entry of judgment; and (3) the court erred in ruling that Palagin was not respondents’ employee (§ 2750.5).
We conclude that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burkes v. Robertson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Adanna Car Wash Corp. v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Burkes v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Dobarro v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Li v. Dept. of Industrial Relations etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.