Legal Opinion

Nelson v. National Fund Raising Consultants, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1992No. 59192-0PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utíer, J.

Maurice DeShazer and National Fund Raising Consultants, Inc. (hereafter DeShazer) assign error to a Washington State Court of Appeals decision affirming a trial court judgment that DeShazer violated the Franchise Investment Protection Act, RCW 19.100, in his dealings with Scott and Katherine Nelson. DeShazer contends he did not violate the Franchise Investment Protection Act or the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. We hold that De-Shazer violated the Franchise Investment Protection Act, and affirm the trial court.

DeShazer is the president of National Fund Raising Consultants, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lobdell v. Sugar 'N Spice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Morris v. International Yogurt Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Prince v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Corp v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dwyer v. J.I. Kislak Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. MAK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  5. Dwyer v. JI Kislak Mortg. Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API