W. R. Arthur & Co. v. Department of Taxation
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The legislature recognized that there would be difficulties in apportioning the taxes of a unitary business which operates partly in Wisconsin and partly outside this state. A “unitary” business is one which functions as a single unit; that is, it is not divided into a separate entity for each of the states in which it operates. The legislature also recognized that no fixed formula would fairly fit all the multitudinous types of business. Accordingly, it gave a broad mandate to the Department of Taxation in sec. 71.07 (5), Stats., to prescribe rules to fit those cases which do not fall within…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Laabs v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Department of Taxation v. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Department of Taxation v. O. H. Kindt Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- American Motors Corp. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Interstate Finance Corp. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Woller v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.