Department of Taxation v. Blatz Brewing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The first question is whether Blatz is “engaged in business” within and without the state within the meaning of sec. 71.07 (2), Stats., for 1945 and 1947. The department contends this means “doing business” and the apportionment of income can only apply between the particular states in which the taxpayer is “doing business” to exempt from the Wisconsin income tax that portion of the net income which is derived from business conducted outside the state. Blatz contends this concept of “doing business” is too narrow a construction of the statute and it is doing business in a tax sense by its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Mitchell, County Attorney (Three Cases)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Coors Porcelain Company v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- W. R. Arthur & Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Neu's Supply Line, Inc. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.