Laabs v. Tax Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
During the years 1912 through 1925, plaintiff invented and developed certain methods and equipment for the disposal of dead animals. Pie obtained letters patent therefor in 1925, and assigned his rights to Allbright-*416Nell Company, of Chicago, on a royalty basis. During 1926 and 1927, plaintiff received royalties, reporting them in his income tax returns. In May, 1928, the supreme court of the United States, in Long v. Rockwood, 277 U. S. 142, 48 Sup. Ct. 463, held that income from patent royalties was not subject to taxation by the states. In January, 1929, the Wisconsin Tax Commission…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- O'Malley v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. PicotteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.