Rohr v. Stanton
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
Plaintiffs brought this action for the purpose of enforcing as against the individual defendants named their liability as stockholders of the defendant Stanton Trust & Savings Bank of Great Falls, Montana (hereafter inferred to as the bank), under the provisions of section 6036 of the Revised Codes of 1921, which, as amended by Chapter 9, page 24, of the Session Laws of 1923, reads: “The stockholders of every bank shall be severally and individually liable, equally and ratably, and not one for the other, for all contracts, debts, and engagements of such corporation, to the extent of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Green v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Rand v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
- Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blackwelder v. Fergus Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Murray v. CreeseMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Nunnelly v. First Federal Bldg. Loan Ass'n of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Brown v. RobertsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Anders v. KiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.