Bunyan v. American Glycerin Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
In an action on the case, appellee charged that on February 7, 1921, and for a long time prior thereto, the American Glycerin Company and Charles Townsend were possessed of and were using and operating a nitroglycerin business and were engaged in the manufacture, storage, transportation and use .of nitroglycerin, in shooting wells in Lawrence county and elsewhere, and that the same is a high explosive of the most dangerous and deadly kind; that it is a heavy, sticky liquid and when poured from the can some of it remains therein; that they carelessly and negligently scattered and left the used…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Anderson v. West Chicago Street RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Meece v. Holland Furnace Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
- Northrop v. LopatkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Wellman v. Fordson Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rogina v. Midwest Flying Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.