Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1935No. Nos. 7447, 7457, 7550, 7580, 7595PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In each of these cases, except United States v. Jent, No. 7550, a motion to strike the bill of exceptions was made on the ground it was not prepared in time. The certificate to the bill of exceptions in each case contains the following recital: “That the above and foregoing bill of exceptions was duly and regularly filed with the clerk of the said court and thereafter duly and regularly served within the time authorized by law; and that no amendments were proposed to said bill of exceptions excepting such as are embodied therein; that due and regular notice of time for settlement and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Southwest Metals Co. v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. StreitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. AlcornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Long v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Sims v. DouglassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936