Legal Opinion
Alrayashi v. Rouge Steel Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 11, 1989No. 2:87-cv-73664PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for alleged injuries suffered in the course of his employment on Defendant Rouge Steel Company’s vessel, the William Clay Ford. Plaintiff asserts a right to recovery under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, for negligence, and general admiralty and maritime law for unseaworthiness and maintenance and cure. Currently before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern the procedure in admiralty actions. Fed.R.Civ.P. 1. Although the negligence standard in Jones…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert West v. Midland Enterprises, Inc., the Ohio River Company, and Motor Vessel W.H. DickhonerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Musleh v. Am. S.S. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- In Re RJF International Corp. for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Civil & MaritimeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Nurkiewicz v. Vacation Break USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000