Legal Opinion
Scott v. Weinberg
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 28, 1958No. 36971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
“Where, as in this case, no motion for new trial was made, and where error might have been assigned upon the judgment complained of on two or more possible grounds, such as, that it was contrary to law for stated reasons, or that it was contrary to the evidence, or that the judge should have caused the! issue to be tried by a jury, and the bill of exceptions contains, as here, no assignment of error except that the judgment complained of is contrary to law, the assignment is too general and indefinite to raise any question for decision. Groover, Stubbs & Co. v. Inman, 60…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Groover, Stubbs & Co. v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Fulton County v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CoolidgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- City of Douglas v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Price v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barron Buick, Inc. v. Kennesaw Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Grant v. Charles S. Martin Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- State Highway Department v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959