Groover, Stubbs & Co. v. Inman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Judgments. Practice in the Superior Court. Liens. Laws. Evidence. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Hansell. Lowndes Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Judgments. Practice in the Superior Court. Liens. Laws. Evidence. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Hansell. Lowndes Superior Court. May Term, 1877. The following, taken in connection with the decision, sufficiently reports this case: Groover, Stubbs & Co. objected to the execution offered in evidence by Mary Inman, administratrix, et al., administrators, because said execution appeared on its face to have been issued against Daniel I. Inman and Malcom D. Jones, and the name of Daniel I. Inman appeared to have been changed wherever it occurred in said execution, to Daniel I. Jones,…
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
This case came before the court below upon the question *408as to whether Groover, Stubbs & Co., or whether the administrators of Jeremiah Inman, deceased, were entitled to the money arising from the sale of the property of Daniel I. Jones, deceased, (which had been sold by consent) on a bill filed to marshal the assets of Jones’ estate. The question was submitted to the court for decision, without the intervention of a jury. After hearing the evidence, the court decreed that the administrators of J. Inman had a valid judgment against Daniel I. Jones, deceased, and ordered…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Wade v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Petty v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CoolidgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Barron Buick, Inc. v. Kennesaw Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.