Legal Opinion
Barron Buick, Inc. v. Kennesaw Finance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1962No. 39227PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The defendant in error has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no sufficient assignment of error is made by the plaintiff in error to the rule absolute granted by the trial court. The rule absolute reads: “After a hearing in the above styled matter, it is ordered that the defendant, Kermit C. Sanders, Sheriff of C'obb County, Georgia, pay to Kennesaw Finance Company the amount of $470.30, the amount of the lien claimed under the money rule filed in this case and apply the balance of the funds in his hands to the payment of court cost.”
The plaintiff in error excepted to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Muscogee Manufacturing Co. v. Eagle & Phenix MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Clay v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Binion v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Fraser v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ray v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. BoeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- John E. Tompkins, as of the Last Will and Testament of Steven M. Tompkins, Deceased v. The United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Performance Food Group, Inc., v. Davis.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018