Legal Opinion
State v. Voelkel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 6, 1964No. File No. CR 9-2191PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
In a trial to the court the defendant was convicted of hunting on Sunday, injuring *461a dog and resisting arrest. General Statutes §§ 26-73, 22-351, 53-165. He was found not guilty on an additional charge of hunting without a license. § 26-27. In his appeal, he assigns error in the denial of requested changes in the finding, in the court’s conclusions in finding him guilty of a nonexistent crime and in concluding that upon all the evidence he was guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. “Upon this last assignment of error, we determine from the entire evidence whether the court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Sharkey v. SkiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- State v. JaimeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- State v. BrownConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- State v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Addario v. Maher, No. Cv93 04 51 77s (Jun. 10, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.