Legal Opinion

State v. Ali

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1997No. 71256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is before the court on the accelerated docket pursuant to App. R. 1.1 and LoeApp.R. 25.

Defendant-appellant Hakim Ali appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for return of property. Defendant contends that the state failed to prove that the confiscated property was contraband, the state failed to timely file its petition for forfeiture, and the court failed to determine that the forfeiture constituted an excessive fine in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. We find that the trial court’s order requiring forfeiture of the money was in error and reverse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GolstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Village of Chagrin Falls v. LovemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BustamanteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Watkins, 07 Je 54 (12-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Dayton Police Department v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. AbstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. IhrabiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API