Legal Opinion

Dayton Police Department v. Byrd

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2010No. 23551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Froelich, Judge.

{¶ 1} Petitioner-appellant, the Dayton Police Department, appeals from a June 30, 2009 trial court decision denying its petition seeking the forfeiture of a car and cash seized from respondent-appellee, Jason Byrd, upon his arrest for trafficking in marijuana, a fifth-degree felony. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

I

{¶ 2} The magistrate’s decision set forth the following statement of facts:

{¶ 3} “On February 24, 2008, Dayton Police Officers Spielman and Malson observed a vehicle in the area of West Third Street and James H. McGee.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BaumholtzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Liebold v. Hiddens, 21487 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AbstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. In re $449 U.S. CurrencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. IhrabiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. ConwayOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. In Re $18,823.06 U.S. Currency AndOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API