Legal Opinion

Rice v. City of Watertown

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1938No. File No. 8194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Section four of article thirteen of the Constitution of South 'Dakota contains the following language:

'‘The debt of any * * * city * * * shall never exceed five (5) per centum upon the assessed valuation of the taxable property therein * *

To this language which appeared in the Constitution at the time of its adoption there was added by separate amendments in the years 1896 and 1902 respectively, the power to “* * * incur an additional indebtedness, not exceeding ten per centum upon the assessed valuation * * * for the purpose of providing water and sewerage, for irrigation, domestic uses,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allison v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Austin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Buntman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Carthage v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. Dean v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. State General Obligation Bond Commission v. KoontzNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Blenner v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Blenner v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API