Legal Opinion

Hom Moon Jung v. Soo

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1946No. 4841PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

This was an action brought in the superior court to determine by declaratory judgment proceedings the right of litigants under a written contract.

We will refer to litigants as designated in the trial court, terming the appellant, plaintiff, and appellees, defendants.

Plaintiff was the owner and operator of a grocery store, meat market and liquor business operated in leased premises in Tucson, Arizona, and having been called into military service assigned his lease, sold the business and merchandise and gave option to buy his liquor license to defendant Rose Soo. Cash…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western Pennsylvania Hospital v. LichliterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. National Union Indemnity Co. v. Bruce Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Appeal of the Brush Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  5. Senter v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Duncan v. TrumanArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Clark v. TinninArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Siler v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Nelson v. NaranjoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API