Legal Opinion

United States v. Willie Maxfield Young

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1975No. 75--1044PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

William Maxfield Young was found guilty by the Court below of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1708, which makes it a crime to have in one’s possession any mail, or article contained therein, which has been stolen. 1 In this direct appeal, he challenges that conviction on three grounds: (1) that the in-court identification of him had been rendered constitutionally impermissible by the unduly suggestive pre-trial photographic identification sessions; (2) that the Court had erred in admitting certain of his statements; and (3) that the Court had erred in denying his motions for acquittal. For the reasons…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BlackstockTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Sebe T. WoodyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Claude Joseph Guay, United States of America v. Daniel GuayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Fairchild v. LockhartDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Arnold Lee Vance v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API