Van Asdale v. International Game Technology
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
This Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower case is before us for the third time. On the first appeal, we reversed the district court’s order granting summary judgment in International Game Technology’s (“IGT”) favor because material facts were in dispute. Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 577 F.3d 989, 991 (9th Cir.2009) (“Van Asdale I”). On remand, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Shawn and Lena Van Asdale on each of their Sar-banes-Oxley claims, and the district court entered judgment consistent with the jury verdict. The district court then denied IGT’s post-trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Zipfel v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Hall v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Price v. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Oreo Corp. v. Lawrence WinnermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Isom v. JDA Software Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.