Legal Opinion
John Bagent v. Richard Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2011No. 10-17601Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
John Bagent, a civilly committed sexually violent predator, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging, inter alia, that defendant Transcor America, LLC violated his procedural and substantive due process rights while transporting him from a jail to a state hospital by failing to segregate him from criminally committed passengers and for otherwise mistreating him. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the decision to grant summary judgment. Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir.2004). We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.