Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Aull

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1967No. 8268PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLYTHE, District Judge.

These appeals by two convicted burglars involve issues regarding change of venue, severance, search and seizure, voir dire examination of jurors, and remarks made during final arguments to the jury.

Edward Aull and John Eubanks, the present defendants, .and two others were jointly informed against for burglary on January 24, 1966, and on March 31, 1966, Aull filed his first change of venue motion, which merely asked that venue be removed from Bernalillo County. On April 5, 1966, he amended his motion to ask that venue be changed to a county other than the: three…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RuffinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MinnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API